Design and test cascade compensator
Simulated system for accurate results
Built-in compensator gain – only passive external components needed
Built-in signal sources

Practical feedback control systems are often required to satisfy design specifications in the transient as well as steady state regions. This is usually not possible by selecting good quality components alone, due to basic physical limitations and characteristics of these components. Cascade compensation is most commonly used for this purpose and the design of compensation networks figures prominently in any course on automatic control systems. Due to the absence of any laboratory experience, however, the concepts of compensation remain rather vague. This unit has been designed to enable the students to go through the complete design procedure and finally verify the performance improvements provided by compensation.
A simulated second order system with variable gain is taken as the ‘unsatisfactory system’.
Simulated system has the advantage of predictable performance which is necessary if the verification of the results is to be meaningful. Built-in variable frquency square wave and sine wave generators are provided for time domain and frequency domain testing of the system. The frequency may be varied in the range 25Hz – 800Hz and its value read on a built-in frequency meter on the panel. Although most practical control systems have bandwidth upto a few Hz only, a higher bandwidth has been chosen for the simulated system to facilitate viewing on a CRO. A pre-wired amplifier makes the implementation of the compensation network extremely simple. Only a few passive components need plugging into the circuit. Lead and lag networks may be designed and tested on the set-up using both frequency domain and s-plane procedures.
The experimental set-up is accompanied by the supporting literature which becomes of vital importance as a major part of the experiment involves theoretical design of compensation networks. Although a complete coverage of design philosophy is not feasible in this document, all efforts have been made to describe the salient features and design steps of the four problems listed above. Also included is a typical design, explicitly covered with compensation network parameter calculation and final results.


• Lag compensation in the frequency domain
• Lead compensation in the frequency domain
• Lag compensation in the s-plane
• Lead compensation in the s-plane
To start with, a suitable ‘uncompensated system’ is chosen, either by an arbitrary setting of the gain control potentiometer or by setting it to result in a given value of overshoot as seen by step response test. Next a set of specifications – both transient and steady state – are prescribed as an objective by the teacher. The design may then be carried out by one of the above techniques and the results verified by a step response or frequency response testing All the above design problems may be undertaken for a very wide range of design specifications.
Notice that the implementation of the compensation network has been made very convenient by a prewired amplifier with calibrated gain.

Features and Specifications
• Simulated ‘uncompensated’ system having adjustable damping. Peak percent overshoot MP , variable from 20% to 50%, and steady state error variables from 50% to 0.5%
• Compensation network implementation through built-in variable gain amplifier. Gain is adjustable from 1 to 11
• Built-in square and sine wave generators for transient and frequency response studies. Frequency adjustable from 25Hz – 800Hz (approx.)
• 220V±10%, 50Hz mains operation • Complete in all respects, except a measuring CRO


Related Products